Looking for:
US FEMA Camps | Geopolitical Monitor.
State, local, tribal and territorial governments and certain private-non-profit organizations in these designated counties are eligible for assistance for. , PA, Cumberland, Camp Hill, 12/06/04, Approved. , PA, Wayne, Canaan, 12/10/08, Approved. , PA, Indiana, Canoe, 01/22/07, Approved.
– Usa fema camps
In , it was finally codified into law and made a component of the Department of Homeland Security. As well as providing large-scale emergency-management, FEMA is also the largest flood-insurer in the United States, mainly because most private insurance companies do not offer flood-insurance. Proponents of the conspiracy theory argue FEMA’s mission is a cover up for its ‘real’ purpose — to assume control of the United States following a major disaster or threat — and that the organization is ‘the executive arm of the coming police state ‘.
The theory in general states that once a disaster or threat of one comes into being, martial law will be declared and FEMA’s emergency powers will come into operation, and it will effectively become the government. Extreme versions state that plans are in place to imprison and kill apolitical American citizens in camps as part of a ‘ population control ‘ plot.
In reality the bright, color coded stickers serve varying purposes for newspaper and mail delivery personnel. Proponents often play into racial fear, asserting that FEMA will use ‘urban gangs’ as auxiliaries to ensure order. FEMA conspiracy theories are often woven into larger conspiracy narratives about ushering in a ‘ New World Order ‘, meaning a totalitarian global government.
One of the first known references to FEMA concentration camps comes from a newsletter issued by Posse Comitatus in , with the warning that ‘hardcore patriots’ were to be detained in them.
The conspiracy was part of the rhetoric of the now largely disbanded Militia of Montana. The self-styled congressional analyst David Fletcher was their spokesman and brought it up in meetings, even pointing out ” United Nations Reserves” that the government was building concentration camps for in the Northern Cascades.
Following the Oklahoma City bombing , the conspiracy theory was discussed by the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Domestic Terrorism. The theory’s inclusion in the plot of the X-Files movie showed its growing reach. Fears of FEMA declined in the early s as foreign terrorists were perceived as the major threat but the lates recession and the election of Barack Obama had renewed opposition among conservatives to the federal government.
Obama’s election also enabled the theory to reach more mainstream right-wing circles whereas it had previously been confined to the fringes. There was a resurgence in the militia movement and with it a resurgence of the FEMA camps conspiracy theory [10] and a corresponding boom in the ” prepper ” economy. Emails from the magazine National Review have also promoted the theory. Congresswoman Michele Bachmann alluded to the theory while in office, [20] as have other Republican Party politicians.
Army is looking for “a Few Good Totalitarians” to herd dissenters into camps. In , fears of the FEMA roundup beginning surfaced with the announcement of a domestic military training operation called Jade Helm County and state officials in Texas denounced the fears [23] and the exercise was completed with no one being placed into an internment camp.
Also in additional speculation about the theory was stoked by retired general Wesley Clark when he called for World War II-style internment camps to be revived to combat Muslim extremism. He stated, “If these people are radicalized and they do not support the United States and they’re disloyal to the United States as a matter of principle, fine, that’s their right. According to the Las Vegas Police Department and witnesses in the weeks leading up to the Las Vegas shooting gunman Stephen Paddock reportedly espoused right-wing anti-government and conspiratorial views, including FEMA conspiracies.
He reportedly told a friend that “sometimes, sacrifices have to be made” in order to encourage the American public to arm themselves. Conspiracy theorists have used the actual internment of Japanese Americans during World War II in specifically constructed camps as evidence that such a scenario at least has historic precedent.
History, the Obama administration contends, is on the side of the American democratic political system. In contrast to authoritarian rival states, the US democratic model is not only more prosperous and stable, but is also able to more successfully adapt to the pressures and opportunities of globalization.
Giuseppe Russo. Aiman Faudzi. Tor-Johan Ekeland. Wayne Ross. Micheal D Warren. Log in with Facebook Log in with Google. Remember me on this computer. Enter the email address you signed up with and we’ll email you a reset link. Need an account? Click here to sign up. Download Free DOC. Download Free PDF. George Ljepojevic. Related Papers. Torture in the Philippines. Much detail has been put into effect to make sure that these centres are operable…they are!
They also come complete with boxcars with chains in them for the movement of people across America. What is also very alarming is that there are , coffins in Georgia, Atlanta…why? The American people have been lied to for many years by the last four presidents, more so than ever before and they have also bypassed the American constitution repeatedly to instil, the practise of doing drills to carry out national martial laws.
These camps will house American dissenting citizens, this is no longer a secret. America also has plans to form the American Union by making Canada and Mexico as other states, incorporated into America as a precursor to the one world order.
The United Nations is already policing the world for the elitists. The American constitution is a joke, it has been challenged and bypassed by the last three presidents. Bill Clinton, George W. Bush and president Obama are not only prolific liars but have also ripped the fabrics of the constitution repeatedly. By the implementation of the Executive Order and also the Patriot Act these three presidents have made a joke of the American constitution.
Many architects demolition experts and also firemen have come forth and said it was an inside job. Not only are there plus? FEMA camps but also other large 6, retail centres buildings are to be emptied out to what? There is no logical reason for the existence of these camps. Whilst previous American presidents have also exercised broad powers the first president to suspend the Habeas Corpus, was Abraham Lincoln.
Abraham suspended the Habeas Corpus during the times of unrest and insurrection during the American Civil war. The supreme court American has ruled that only congress and, not the president could do this. The George W. Bush, administration conveniently completely ignored the entire notion of Habeas Corpus.
With the advent of the internet and other globalized technology man has been intruded upon by means of illegal surveillance not only in America but the world at large in America by the added to the executive order Patriot Act. It is a massive spying ring which has its headquarters in the state of Maryland.
It works in conjunction with its allies, Australia, the U. It is frightening to know that the most powerful government in the world is full of complete idiots. They showed their incompetence not only to their people but the entire world. The northern coast and the gulf of Mexico was wrecked, the city of New Orleans destroyed.
On the other side, that there are people who would argue that what’s happening there is coming from an administration where you have people like Stephen Miller, the president’s adviser on immigration, who very much thinks of identity and what the United States should look like and who should belong and who shouldn’t belong, sees that as a very important part of why we are implementing certain immigration policies. And I’m wondering if you have thought about how that fits into what’s going on here.
I think that we aren’t doing this on the northern border, is first of all really important to note, that in addition to the wave of people that we’ve had this year, the increasing numbers, a lot of the most virulent policies were started or put in place before that surge happened. And so if you look back even further, the first declaration as a candidate that Donald Trump made was to slur Mexicans. Right from the beginning, there was a targeting of people south of the American border.
And I think that that makes any effort to say this isn’t at all related to identity pretty disingenuous. I mean, these camps didn’t begin to exist when this administration came into office. All the way back to Reagan, every single administration at least back to Reagan – and, really, if you wanted to, you could probably go back years – has a hand in the way that immigration has been used as a political football in which everybody wants to look tougher than the next person.
And very few people, it seems, who are in leadership positions are actually regularly saying the things that we’ve known for a long time. I went back and looked at when was the first study that I could find that talked about immigrant crime levels. And I literally found something all the way back in World War I that revealed that immigrants commit less crime than U. And so this idea of the immigrant as a criminal threat, which is a very old idea, has been debunked for a century.
And yet, it is still picked up. It is still used. What happened when President Trump came into office, it appears with a lot of influence from his adviser Stephen Miller, is that detention became central to what was going to happen even more than it had been, that alternatives would not be considered, that we were going to militarize the border and we were going to criminalize border crossing even though it is completely legal to seek asylum.
And so all those things have been put in place over time. You see that with camps. Things can’t just come out of the blue. Usually, it takes a polarization of society, some different policies, to even make it possible. It is really worth realizing that often when camps are set up and kept open, they devolve into worse things.
And if we don’t change the approach that we’re taking to asylum seekers, I think we’re going to end up with a lot more than, you know, a couple dozen people dead so far. FLORIDO: Do you see this argument that toothbrushes and soap aren’t necessarily requirements for safe and sanitary conditions being – fitting into that declining slope? And, you know, the thing is – and this is, as much as anything, why I use the term concentration camp – is if we go back and look at these camps, you will be amazed at what’s happening now that happened very similarly then.
In the Boer camps in South Africa, what was then Southern Africa, in – around , I think, is when this particular thing happened, Emily Hobhouse was a radical who went down and actually went into the camps, which was kind of unprecedented. And the stories she came back with were shocking. And one of the biggest things that she wrote about and insisted on was that there was no soap.
There was no hygiene for these children and that they were getting contagious diseases because of it. And could the government please provide ways for these people to keep clean? And the government basically said, they’re filthy people. And then, eventually, there were more reforms. But there was a real dismissal of her calls for that. I mean, it’s exactly the same stuff that we’re seeing today. FLORIDO: You know, for a lot of people, including people who are genuinely upset and angry about what is happening today in these facilities, according to the reporting we’ve been reading in the last couple weeks, you know, going as far as to call them concentration camps still feels like going too far because at some point, the definition did change, right?
Like, concentration camp came to mean this other thing. And so they think that calling what’s happening now at the border, for example, concentration camps is disrespectful to that history and to the power of what that term has has become.
Don’t they have a point? And I don’t think this is something that we should do lightly. I don’t think that – you know, I am certainly not in any way minimizing the Holocaust. There is nothing in camp history that looks anything like those death camps that were created in the middle of World War II, and nothing should be compared to them.
I think the danger is to say you can’t compare anything to the stuff that came before, and if you do, you somehow have to give them some other name that isn’t what they were called in order to talk about that. If somebody wants to call it irregular detention, if they want to call it extrajudicial detention, sort of a detention of civilians outside the normal legal process, then I’m fine with that.
I think that there are certain groups for whom, you know, their mission is to preserve the memory of the Holocaust, to preserve it and keep it sacrosanct very specifically.
And if those people don’t want to go there, I completely understand that. I think there’s also a reason for going there, which is the history of what happened in those early camps, I believe, tells us some stuff about what’s going to come next. So I think there is a power, a useful power, in naming that is separate just from asserting, like, I want to call them this, and you have to call them this too. That’s not what I’m saying. FLORIDO: This is something that Japanese Americans have sort of tried to do with their own experience and sort of looking back at the history and trying to revise a bit of the way that we think about what for a long time has been called Japanese internment, right?
Why do you think people attach so much importance to what we call these things? PITZER: I think that a lot of times, we use these anodyne names like internment to really underplay what was done to a group of people. And while I think it’s critical that we not compare what happened in Nazi Germany, the entire materiel and intent of a developed nation bent toward creating factories in which people could be killed as quickly and efficiently as possible – you know, there’s nothing else like that – but there are a lot of things like those concentration camps that happened before the war.
And if you say things like internment, then – and you never sort of pondered this term, concentration camp, which I do think Japanese American internment was, then you underplay the damage to the people inside, to the community. It’s been known – doctors have known for a hundred years what this kind of indefinite detention does to people – you know, shattered the Japanese American community as well.
They had to sell off all their goods. And so I think that we have to be careful not to use simpler words to minimize what did actually happen to people. We don’t want to compare it to the Holocaust, but we also don’t want to minimize the damage that is done by this kind of detention.
All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary.
America’s Concentration Camps? : Code Switch : NPR – We hope you enjoyed this free article
State, local, tribal and territorial governments and certain private-non-profit organizations in these designated counties are eligible for assistance for. , PA, Cumberland, Camp Hill, 12/06/04, Approved. , PA, Wayne, Canaan, 12/10/08, Approved. , PA, Indiana, Canoe, 01/22/07, Approved.
Comentários